3 Comments

It’s clear the author of this story didn’t watch the trial. In truth, few watched more than slanted recap videos that slandered Amber. Amber referenced a rumor about Kate Moss and Johnny Depp that circulated in the 90s. She called it a rumor and never said it was true. Many people claim Amber lacked evidence but are unaware that some of her evidence was not permitted to be shown in this trial, just as Depp’s UK trial against The Sun, which he lost, was not allowed to be discussed in this trial. If you watched the verdict, you know that Amber was sued for $10 million for writing the following statement two years after filing for a restraining order: “Two years ago, I became the public face of domestic violence.” The jury had to find this statement false in order to award Depp with anything, but we know it’s far from false. Amber’s face was plastered all over the internet and magazines tagged with the word “abuse” two years prior to that statement. Watch the verdict. Better yet, watch the entire trial and you’ll see what nobody’s talking about: Johnny Depp falling asleep during trial, he and his lawyers scoffing and snickering during witness testimonies, and Ms. Vasquez winking at the jury towards the end.

This wasn’t an abuse case. Neither party can legally sue the other on abuse grounds because of the statement they signed at their divorce. It is strictly a defamatory case. Now look around. Whose name has been slandered outside of this trial? Who’s been lied about? Millions of people believe Amber was snuffing cocaine on the stand while sitting right next to the judge. Why? Because she blew her nose. But when agents and production companies testify that Depp showed up late to set costing them millions, and to red carpet events intoxicated, and Depp himself admits to using many illicit drugs but claims he doesn’t have a problem, he’s the victim. It’s time to wake up.

Expand full comment

Slander and defamation are NOT free speech...just like certain speech is illegal. (Screaming "Fire!" In a movie theater)

It's funny she says this....considering she actually has sued others in the past for things they have said.

Free speech for her, (when it's not) but not for others. (When it is)?

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment